Aşağıdaki Çarpım Tablosunu yazdırmak için en kısa kodu yazın:

1×1=1
1×2=2  2×2=4
1×3=3  2×3=6  3×3=9
1×4=4  2×4=8  3×4=12 4×4=16
1×5=5  2×5=10 3×5=15 4×5=20 5×5=25
1×6=6  2×6=12 3×6=18 4×6=24 5×6=30 6×6=36
1×7=7  2×7=14 3×7=21 4×7=28 5×7=35 6×7=42 7×7=49
1×8=8  2×8=16 3×8=24 4×8=32 5×8=40 6×8=48 7×8=56 8×8=64
1×9=9  2×9=18 3×9=27 4×9=36 5×9=45 6×9=54 7×9=63 8×9=72 9×9=81

Excel, 92 91 Bayt

VBA düzenleyicisinin hemen penceresinden aşağıdaki komutu çalıştırın: Range("A1:I9").Formula="=IF(ROW()<COLUMN(),"""",COLUMN()&""×""&ROW()&""=""&COLUMN()*ROW())" Çıktı doğrudan etkin çalışma sayfasındadır.

Bir sırasını değiştirerek ekstra bir bit golfed ifdeğiştirmek >=için <. Ekran görüntüsünü güncellemedim, ancak çıktıyı değil yalnızca üstteki formülü etkiler.

Python (75)

r=range(1,10)
for i in r:print''.join('%sx%s=%-3s'%(j,i,i*j)for j in r[:i])

diğer iki Python versiyonundan biraz daha iyi golf oynadı.

C ++, 106 98 bayt

İki döngü ve birkaç numara kullandım.

#import <cstdio>
main(){for(int i,j;i++-9;j=0)while(j++-i)printf("%dx%d=%d%c",j,i,i*j,j<i?32:10);}

J: 57 51 karakter

([:;"2*\#"2(":@],'x',":@[,'=',":@*,' '"_)"0/~)>:i.9

Döngü yok.

APL (37)

∆∘.{⊃(⍺≥⍵)/,/(⍕⍺)'×'(⍕⍵)'=',⍕⍺×⍵}∆←⍳9

Ve sadece iki for-loop bile değil. APL'de aşağıdaki yapı:

x ∘.F y

nerede xve ylisteleri vardır ve Fbir fonksiyondur, geçerli Föğe her çiftine xve yve size bir matris verir.

Böylece: ∆∘.×∆←⍳9yukarıdaki fonksiyon her çift için gerekli dizi 9'a size 1 ila çarpım tablosunu oluşturur alır, örneğin (⍕⍺), ardından takip eden sayı, yaylı temsil ×ardından, (⍕⍵)ardından ikinci bir sayısı dize temsili =, ardından ⍕⍺×⍵, sürece ⍺≥⍵.

Yakut: 60 59 karakter

1.upto(9){|i|puts (1..i).map{|j|"%dx%d=%-3d"%[j,i,i*j]}*""}

Örnek çalışma:

bash-4.2$ ruby -e '1.upto(9){|i|puts (1..i).map{|j|"%dx%d=%-3d"%[j,i,i*j]}*""}'
1x1=1 
1x2=2  2x2=4 
1x3=3  2x3=6  3x3=9 
1x4=4  2x4=8  3x4=12 4x4=16
1x5=5  2x5=10 3x5=15 4x5=20 5x5=25
1x6=6  2x6=12 3x6=18 4x6=24 5x6=30 6x6=36
1x7=7  2x7=14 3x7=21 4x7=28 5x7=35 6x7=42 7x7=49
1x8=8  2x8=16 3x8=24 4x8=32 5x8=40 6x8=48 7x8=56 8x8=64
1x9=9  2x9=18 3x9=27 4x9=36 5x9=45 6x9=54 7x9=63 8x9=72 9x9=81

Perl, 54 Characters

printf"%dx$?=%-3d"x$?.$/,map{$_,$_*$?}1..$?while$?++<9

APL (Dyalog), 28

↑{⍵{⍕⍵,'×',⍺,'=',⍺×⍵}¨⍳⍵}¨⍳9

Analogous to a double loop in other languages

{⍵{...}¨⍳⍵}¨⍳9 sets up the double loop
⍕⍵,'×',⍺,'=',⍺×⍵ creates the string for each pair
↑ Convert array of array of strings to a matrix of stings

Output

1 × 1 = 1                                                                                                 
1 × 2 = 2  2 × 2 = 4                                                                                      
1 × 3 = 3  2 × 3 = 6   3 × 3 = 9                                                                          
1 × 4 = 4  2 × 4 = 8   3 × 4 = 12  4 × 4 = 16                                                             
1 × 5 = 5  2 × 5 = 10  3 × 5 = 15  4 × 5 = 20  5 × 5 = 25                                                 
1 × 6 = 6  2 × 6 = 12  3 × 6 = 18  4 × 6 = 24  5 × 6 = 30  6 × 6 = 36                                     
1 × 7 = 7  2 × 7 = 14  3 × 7 = 21  4 × 7 = 28  5 × 7 = 35  6 × 7 = 42  7 × 7 = 49                         
1 × 8 = 8  2 × 8 = 16  3 × 8 = 24  4 × 8 = 32  5 × 8 = 40  6 × 8 = 48  7 × 8 = 56  8 × 8 = 64             
1 × 9 = 9  2 × 9 = 18  3 × 9 = 27  4 × 9 = 36  5 × 9 = 45  6 × 9 = 54  7 × 9 = 63  8 × 9 = 72  9 × 9 = 81

Mathematica, 45

Pretty boring, but I guess it serves as a syntax comparison:

Grid@Table[Row@{a, "x", b, "=", a b}, {a, 9}, {b, a}]

D, 75 chars

foreach(i,1..10){foreach(j,1..i+1){writef("%dx%d=%d ",i,j,i*j);}writeln();}

you just said code not function or full program

VBScript (133); without loops.

g=""
sub m(x,y)
    g=x&"x"&y&"="&x*y&vbTab&g
    if x>1 then 
        m x-1,y
    elseif y>1 then 
        g=vbLf&g 
        m y-1,y-1
    end if
end sub
m 9,9
wscript.echo g

On request of the challenger: no loops. This code uses recursive subroutine calls.

Maple, 64

seq(printf(seq(printf("%ax%a=%a ",j,i,i*j),j=1..i),"\n"),i=1..9)

x86_64 machine code (linux), 175 99 76 bytes

0000000000400080 <_start>:
  400080:   66 bf 09 00             mov    $0x9,%di

0000000000400084 <_table.L2>:
  400084:   6a 0a                   pushq  $0xa
  400086:   89 fe                   mov    %edi,%esi

0000000000400088 <_table.L3>:
  400088:   89 f0                   mov    %esi,%eax
  40008a:   f7 e7                   mul    %edi

000000000040008c <_printInteger>:
  40008c:   6a 20                   pushq  $0x20
  40008e:   3c 0a                   cmp    $0xa,%al
  400090:   7d 02                   jge    400094 <_printInteger.L1>
  400092:   6a 20                   pushq  $0x20

0000000000400094 <_printInteger.L1>:
  400094:   66 31 d2                xor    %dx,%dx
  400097:   b3 0a                   mov    $0xa,%bl
  400099:   66 f7 f3                div    %bx
  40009c:   83 c2 30                add    $0x30,%edx
  40009f:   52                      push   %rdx
  4000a0:   66 85 c0                test   %ax,%ax
  4000a3:   75 ef                   jne    400094 <_printInteger.L1>
  4000a5:   6a 3d                   pushq  $0x3d
  4000a7:   66 57                   push   %di
  4000a9:   80 04 24 30             addb   $0x30,(%rsp)
  4000ad:   6a 78                   pushq  $0x78
  4000af:   66 56                   push   %si
  4000b1:   80 04 24 30             addb   $0x30,(%rsp)
  4000b5:   ff ce                   dec    %esi
  4000b7:   75 cf                   jne    400088 <_table.L3>
  4000b9:   ff cf                   dec    %edi
  4000bb:   75 c7                   jne    400084 <_table.L2>

00000000004000bd <_printChars>:
  4000bd:   66 ba 00 08             mov    $0x800,%dx
  4000c1:   b0 01                   mov    $0x1,%al
  4000c3:   66 bf 01 00             mov    $0x1,%di
  4000c7:   48 89 e6                mov    %rsp,%rsi
  4000ca:   0f 05                   syscall

This is a dump of the binary file, and all of this is 175 bytes. It basically does the same two loops that all the answers do, but printing to the console is a bit harder and basically requires pushing the characters to print onto the stack in reverse, and then making a (linux specific) syscall to actually put those chars into stdout.

I've now optimized this so that only 1 write operation is performed (faster!) and has magic numbers (wow!) and by pushing the entire result onto the stack backwards before making the syscall. I also took out the exit routine because who needs proper exit code?

Here's a link to my first and second attempts, in their original nasm syntax.

I welcome anyone who has any other suggestions on how it can be improved. I can also explain the logic in more detail if anyone is curious.

(Also, it doesn't print the extra spaces to make all the columns aligned, but if that's required I can put the logic in at the cost of a few more bytes).

EDIT: Now prints extra spaces and is golfed down even more! It's doing some pretty crazy stuff with the registers, and is probably unstable if this program were to be expanded.

Javascript, 190 bytes

Late to the party, but I was piqued by @jdstankosky 's comment and decided to take a different approach. Here's a Javascript entry that mauls a template and evals itself along the way.

t="a*b=c ";u="";r=u;for(i=1;i<10;i++){a=0;u=u+t;r+=u.split(' ').map(x=>x.replace('a',++a).replace('b',i)).map(x=>x.replace('*','x').replace('c',eval(x.substr(0,3)))).join(' ')+'\n'}alert(r);

Un-golfed version (slightly older version in which a function returns the table instead of a script alerting it, but the same principles apply):

function f()
{
    t="a*b=c "; // template for our multiplication table
    u="";r="";  // tmp- and return values
    for(i=1;i<10;i++)
    {
        a=0;    // is auto-incremented in MAP
        u=u+t;// extend the template once per iteration
        v=u.split(' '); // Smash the template to pieces
        w=v.map(x=>x.replace('a', ++a).replace('b', i)) // MAP replaces the A and B's with the correct numbers
        w=w.map(x=>x.replace('*', 'x').replace('c', eval(x.substring(0,3)))).join(' '); // second map evals that and replaces c with the answer, makes the asteriks into an X
        r=r+w+'\n'  // results get concatenated
    }
    return r;
}

Pascal, 128 bytes

One recursive procedure takes care of everything. Call with m(9,9).

procedure m(i,j:integer);begin if i<1then Exit;if i=j then begin m(i-1,j-1);writeln;end;m(i-1,j);write(i,'x',j,'=',i*j,' ');end;

Ungolfed:

procedure mul(i, j: integer);
begin
  if i<1 then
    Exit;
  if i=j then
  begin
    mul(i-1, j-1);
    writeln;
  end;
  mul(i-1, j);
  write(i,'x',j,'=',i*j,' ');
end;

Fourier, 756 632 bytes

Thanks @BetaDecay for 124 bytes!

1o120~Ea1o61a1o10~Na1oEa2o61a2o32~Saa2oEa2o61a4oNa1oEa3o61a3oSaa2oEa3o61a6oSaa3oEa3o61a9o^a1oEa4o61a4oSaa2oEa4o61a8oSaa3oEa4o61a12oSa4oEa4o61a16oNa1oEa5o61a5oSaa2oEa5o61aNoSa3oEa5o61a15oSa4oEa5o61a20oSa5oEa5o61a25oNa1oEa6o61a6oSaa2oEa6o61a12oSa3oEa6o61a18oSa4oEa6o61a24oSa5oEa6o61a30oSa6oEa6o61a36oNa1oEa7o61a7oSaa2oEa7o61a14oSa3oEa7o61a21oSa4oEa7o61a28oSa5oEa7o61a35oSa6oEa7o61a42oSa7oEa7o61a49oNa1oEa8o61a8oSaa2oEa8o61a16oSa3oEa8o61a24oSa4oEa8o61aSoa5oEa8o61a40oSa6oEa8o61a48oSa7oEa8o61a56oSa8oEa8o61a64oNa1oEa9o61a9oSaa2oEa9o61a18oSa3oEa9o61a27oSa4oEa9o61a36oSa5oEa9o61a45oSa6oEa9o61a54oSa7oEa9o61a63oSa8oEa9o61a72oSa9oEa9o61a81o

vba 55

(immediate window)

for f=1 to 9:for j=1 to f:?f;"x";j;"=";f*j,:next:?:next

note - GWBasic only needs 2 extra characters:

1 for f=1 to 9:for j=1 to f:?f;"x";j;"=";f*j,:next:?:next

Javascript, 75

for(s="",a=b=1;a<10;b=a==b?(a++,alert(s),s="",1):b+1)s+=b+"x"+a+"="+a*b+" "

I wonder if something better than two (combined?) for loops is possible...

Coreutils/Bash: 147 136 135

for i in {1..9}; do
  yes $'\n' | head -n $[i-1] > $i
  paste -dx= <(yes $i) <(seq $i 9) <(seq $[i*i] $i $[9*i]) |head -n$[10-i] >> $i
done
paste {1..9}

Golfed, using explicit newline and, using deprecated head option (thanks manatwork):

for i in {1..9};do yes '
'|head -$[i-1]>$i;paste -dx= <(yes $i) <(seq $i 9) <(seq $[i*i] $i $[9*i])| head -$[10-i]>>$i;done;paste {1..9}

Output:

1x1=1                               
1x2=2   2x2=4                           
1x3=3   2x3=6   3x3=9                       
1x4=4   2x4=8   3x4=12  4x4=16                  
1x5=5   2x5=10  3x5=15  4x5=20  5x5=25              
1x6=6   2x6=12  3x6=18  4x6=24  5x6=30  6x6=36          
1x7=7   2x7=14  3x7=21  4x7=28  5x7=35  6x7=42  7x7=49      
1x8=8   2x8=16  3x8=24  4x8=32  5x8=40  6x8=48  7x8=56  8x8=64  
1x9=9   2x9=18  3x9=27  4x9=36  5x9=45  6x9=54  7x9=63  8x9=72  9x9=81

LOLCODE, 202 bytes

IM IN YR o UPPIN YR b TIL BOTH SAEM b AN 10
c R ""
IM IN YR i UPPIN YR a TIL BOTH SAEM a AN SUM OF b AN 1
c R SMOOSH c SMOOSH a "x" b "=" PRODUKT OF a AN b " " MKAY
IM OUTTA YR i
VISIBLE c
IM OUTTA YR o

Ungolfed:

HAI 1.3 BTW Unnecessary in current implementations
IM IN YR outer UPPIN YR multiplicand TIL BOTH SAEM multiplicand AN 10
    I HAS A output ITZ ""
    IM IN YR inner UPPIN YR multiplier TIL BOTH SAEM multiplier AN SUM OF multiplicand AN 1
        output R SMOOSH output AN SMOOSH multiplier AN "x" AN multiplicand AN "=" AN PRODUCKT OF multiplicand AN multiplier AN " " MKAY MKAY BTW AN is optional to separate arguments, a linebreak is an implicit MKAY.
    IM OUTTA YR inner
    VISIBLE output
IM OUTTA YR outer
KTHXBYE BTW Unnecessary in current implementations

Pythonated for non-leetspeakers:

for multiplicand in range(1, 10):
    output = ""
    for multiplier in range(1, multiplicand + 1):
        output = output + (multiplier + "x" + multiplicand + "=" + str(multiplicand * multiplier) + " ")
    print(output)

c#, 142 bytes

Enumerable.Range(1,9).ToList().ForEach(i =>Enumerable.Range(1,i).ToList().ForEach(j=>Console.Write("{0}x{1}={2}{3}",j,i,j*i,j==i?"\n":"\t")));

And not a for in sight...

><>, 50 bytes

1v
 1
?\::n"x"o{::n"="o}*n" "o1+:{:})
 \~1+:a=?;ao

You can try it on the online interpreter.

Note that there is trailing spaces on each lines, which might make it incorrect (OP hasn't stated on this point as of this answer).

///, 268 bytes

/_/\/\///x/×_N/x9=_E/x8=_V/x7=_S/x6=_F/x5=_R/x4=_O/
1_t/  2_h/ 3/1x1=1Ox2=2tx2=4Ox3=3tx3=6 hx3=9OR4tR8 hR12 4R16OF5tF10hF15 4F20 5F25OS6tS12hS18 4S24 5S30 6S36OV7tV14hV21 4V28 5V35 6V42 7V49OE8tE16hE24 4E32 5E40 6E48 7E56 8E64ON9tN18hN27 4N36 5N45 6N54 7N63 8N72 9N81

JAVA, 103 94 92 90 bytes

Using JShell from Java 9 SDK allows me to save large amount of space

for(int i=0,j;i++<9;)for(j=1;j<=i;)System.out.print(i+"*"+j+"="+i*j+"\t"+(j++<i?"":"\n"))

Following Kevin's suggestion I reduced solution by 2 bytes.

Thanks to cliffroot, I was able to reduce it by another 1 byte

C 79 bytes

i=1,j=1;f(){printf("%dx%d=%d ",j,i,i*j);++i>j?++j,i=1,j<=9?puts(""),f():0:f();}

the main

main(){f();}

the table

1x1=1 
2x1=2 2x2=4 
3x1=3 3x2=6 3x3=9 
4x1=4 4x2=8 4x3=12 4x4=16 
5x1=5 5x2=10 5x3=15 5x4=20 5x5=25 
6x1=6 6x2=12 6x3=18 6x4=24 6x5=30 6x6=36 
7x1=7 7x2=14 7x3=21 7x4=28 7x5=35 7x6=42 7x7=49 
8x1=8 8x2=16 8x3=24 8x4=32 8x5=40 8x6=48 8x7=56 8x8=64 
9x1=9 9x2=18 9x3=27 9x4=36 9x5=45 9x6=54 9x7=63 9x8=72 9x9=81 

Tcl 98 chars

while {[incr a]<10} {set b 0;while {[incr b]<=$a} {puts -nonewline "$a×$b=[expr $a*$b] "};puts ""}

Javascript: 82 characters

o="";for(a=1;a<10;a++){for(b=1;b<=a;b++){o+=a+"x"+b+"="+(a*b)+" "}o+="\n"}alert(o)

Python: 87

I'm eyeballing the solutions others have posted and most of them don't appear to get the spacing correct.

for i in range(1,10):print''.join(('%s×%s=%s'%(j,i,i*j)).ljust(7)for j in range(1,i+1))

Python (79)

or (77) if I use range(10) except that produces an empty line at the start

for i in range(1,10):print' '.join('%dx%d=%-2d'%(j,i,j*i)for j in range(1,i+1))

1x1=1 
1x2=2  2x2=4 
1x3=3  2x3=6  3x3=9 
1x4=4  2x4=8  3x4=12 4x4=16
1x5=5  2x5=10 3x5=15 4x5=20 5x5=25
1x6=6  2x6=12 3x6=18 4x6=24 5x6=30 6x6=36
1x7=7  2x7=14 3x7=21 4x7=28 5x7=35 6x7=42 7x7=49
1x8=8  2x8=16 3x8=24 4x8=32 5x8=40 6x8=48 7x8=56 8x8=64
1x9=9  2x9=18 3x9=27 4x9=36 5x9=45 6x9=54 7x9=63 8x9=72 9x9=81

Perl: 65 , 62 characters

map{map{printf"%dx%d=%2d ",$_,$i,$_*$i}1..($i=$_);print$/}1..9