integralindeki terimi basitleştirmek
T=e−12((zy−μxσx)2−y)yk/2−2
find the polynomial p(y) such that
[p(y)e−12((zy−μxσx)2−y)]′=p′(y)e−12((zy−μxσx)2−y)+p(y)[−12((zy−μxσx)2−y)]′e−12((zy−μxσx)2−y)=T
which reduces to finding p(y) such that
p′(y)+p(y)[−12((zy−μxσx)2−y)]′=yk/2−2
or
p′(y)−12p(y)(zμxσ2xy−2z2σ2xy−3−1)=yk/2−2
which can be done evaluating all powers of y seperately
edit after comments
Above solution won't work as it diverges.
Yet, some others have worked on this type of product.
Using Fourrier transform:
Schoenecker, Steven, and Tod Luginbuhl. "Characteristic Functions of the Product of Two Gaussian Random Variables and the Product of a Gaussian and a Gamma Random Variable." IEEE Signal Processing Letters 23.5 (2016): 644-647.
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7425177/#full-text-section
For the product Z=XY with X∼N(0,1) and Y∼Γ(α,β) they obtained the characteristic function:
φZ=1βα|t|−αexp(14β2t2)D−α(1β|t|)
with Dα Whittaker's function ( http://people.math.sfu.ca/~cbm/aands/page_686.htm )
Using Mellin transform:
Springer and Thomson have described more generally the evaluation of products of beta, gamma and Gaussian distributed random variables.
Springer, M. D., and W. E. Thompson. "The distribution of products of beta, gamma and Gaussian random variables." SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 18.4 (1970): 721-737.
http://epubs.siam.org/doi/10.1137/0118065
They use the Mellin integral transform. The Mellin transform of Z is the product of the Mellin transforms of X and Y (see http://epubs.siam.org/doi/10.1137/0118065 or https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aoms/1177730201). In the studied cases of products the reverse transform of this product can be expressed as a Meijer G-function for which they also provide and prove computational methods.
They did not analyze the product of a Gaussian and gamma distributed variable, although you might be able to use the same techniques. If I try to do this quickly then I believe it should be possible to obtain an H-function (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fox_H-function ) although I do not directly see the possibility to get a G-function or make other simplifications.
M{fY(x)|s}=2s−1Γ(12k+s−1)/Γ(12k)
and
M{fX(x)|s}=1π2(s−1)/2σs−1Γ(s/2)
you get
M{fZ(x)|s}=1π232(s−1)σs−1Γ(s/2)Γ(12k+s−1)/Γ(12k)
and the distribution of Z is:
fZ(y)=12πi∫c+i∞c−i∞y−sM{fZ(x)|s}ds
which looks to me (after a change of variables to eliminate the 232(s−1) term) as at least a H-function
what is still left is the puzzle to express this inverse Mellin transform as a G function. The occurrence of both s and s/2 complicates this. In the separate case for a product of only Gaussian distributed variables the s/2 could be transformed into s by substituting the variable x=w2. But because of the terms of the chi-square distribution this does not work anymore. Maybe this is the reason why nobody has provided a solution for this case.